Gay Malaysian pastor to tie the knot with his partner
KUALA LUMPUR: A Malaysian self-confessed gay pastor is to marry his African-American partner soon.
Press reports stated that Rev Ou Yang Wen Feng (pic) was likely to wed the Broadway musical producer by the end of the month or early September with ceremonies planned in New York and Malaysia.
Ou Yang told AFP in an interview in Hong Kong that his partner had popped the question on June 26, two days after New York City legalised same-sex marriages.
“He went to a church and wrote a song for me. He proposed at the end of the song in public,” the 41-year-old pastor said.
Ou Yang, who now serves at the Metropolitan Community Church (MCC) in New York, urged gay men and women to speak out to “break the vicious cycle” and help fight misconceptions about the gay community.
According to the MCC homepage, the church is part of an international movement of Christian churches reaching out to all, including homosexuals, bisexuals and transsexuals.
“When society discriminates against gay people, you only push gay people into the closet,” Ou Yang said.
Ou Yang’s “coming out” took place in 2006 when he published the story of his decision to make public his sexual orientation, after a nine-year marriage to his now ex-wife, whom he described as an “angel“.
“She asked for a divorce, and this is the biggest gift she could ever give me, she set me free. I owe her big time,” said the pastor who grew up in a conservative Christian family.
Several netizens praised Ou Yang, who has tattoos on his shoulder and arm, as the “most trendy pastor”. They said they had not spotted other pastors wearing ear-rings.
Some said he looked like Hong Kong actor David Wu and Chinese actor Chang Chen.
Ou Yang, a former columnist with Sin Chew Daily, said Kuala Lumpur was “growing and developing” with Sunday services and bible studies.
Ou Yang’s best friend, known only as Joe, was quoted by Guang Ming Daily as saying that he was happy for the couple.
Taken from The Star
I am wondering why The Star is focusing on gays marrying other gays.
Are you indirectly promoting men marrying men? Gays are motherfuckers especially those like Anwar Al Juburi who are not only a gay but also a traitor of this country. Fuck you to hell!
Fuck you! If God wants men to marry other men, then why did He create women so that they can bear children?
Those who are gays are stupid. Don't promote to anyone else to be as stupid as you!!!
Did you know that Sodom had been turned inside out by Allah for his wrath because men fucked other men there???
But surely you don't care and will find any petty excuse to defend your gross act...
Yes... It's gross when you people fucked other men or women in the butt where the shit comes out. Ewwwww!
What if your partner has diarrhoea and you fucked him and his shit stuck to your dick??? That is so gross!
You guys should be thrown with faeces for indulging in such a gross act.
No wonder there are AIDS because you indulge in abnormal sex. You gays will go to hell for fucking other guys, assholes!
Religious teacher detained for sodomising student
Bernama
Thursday, August 11th, 2011 21:57:00
KUALA TERENGGANU: A secondary school religious teacher here has been detained for suspected sodomy of a student in the school.
The teacher for Islamic Studies was held in his house at the teachers' quarters in Batu Rakit near here at about 4am.
State Crime Investigation Department head, ACP K Manoharan said the teacher's arrest followed a police report by a student aged 13 years at the Batu Rakit Police Station yesterday evening alleging sodomy by the teacher.
"The 42-year-old teacher is married and is believed to have carried out the dastardly act for three times from March to June at the school teacher's quarters which is beside the boys hostel where the victim is residing," he said when met at his office today.
According to Manoharan, police are still investigating the case and did not rule out the possibility that there maybe more students falling victims to the teacher.
The victim has been sent to Sultanah Nur Zahirah Hospital to undergo medical examination.
Senior Session Court Registrar, Rosila Nik allowed the teacher to be remanded for four days beginning today for further investigation.
The case is being investigated under Section 377 C which carries a penalty jail term of not exceeding 20 years and caning.
Taken from The Malay Mail
We'll see if this sodomiser aka a satanic secondory school religious teacher will be given leniency to postpone his case up to 3 to 4 years just like the privileges given to him.
Anwar Ibrahim is a hard-core sodomiser and when he becomes Prime Minister of this Islamic country, this country won't be an Islamic one anymore.
Instead, it will be another Sodom where men will prefer other men to fuck with. So the girls will be free from being raped and sodomised.
The only thing is that, Anwar Al Juburi loves to fuck both men and women so nobody will be safe from his terrorism of fucking and sodomising anyone he likes.
If that is what you want for this country, then go ahead and support this sodomiser to be Malaysia's Prime Minister.
Anwar Al Juburi is a satan who have cooperated with the satan in DAP which are truly communists.
The deviationist in PAS who had been using Islam as their stepping stone to power are also satanic followers.
Therefore, if you are a true Muslim and will uphold Islam as the highest thing in your life, you will definitely defend Islam from motherfuckers like Anwar Al Juburi, the communists in DAP and the deviationists in PAS.
PAS veeps file suits over unlawful arrests at Bersih rally
KUALA LUMPUR: Two PAS vice-presidents have filed suits against the police and the Government for wrongful and unlawful arrests during the Bersih rally on July 9.
Datuk Mahfuz Omar and Salahuddin Ayub named arresting officer Insp Mohd Zaid Madzizat from the Brickfields district police station, the Brickfields OCPD, the Inspector-General of Police and the Government as defendants.
Mahfuz, who is Pokok Sena MP, and Salahuddin, who is Kubang Kerian MP, filed their suits through Messr Faiz Fadzil & Co at the Kuala Lumpur High Court yesterday.
They claim that their arrest on July 9 at 11.50am at KL Sentral was mala fide because on July 6, through a magistrate's court order, they were restricted from entering several locations in Kuala Lumpur on July 9, and that KL Sentral did not fall under that order.
They said they were not present anywhere in the restricted areas.
They claimed to have incurred losses, damage, inconvenience and injuries due to their arrest.
Mahfuz and Salahuddin are claiming general damages, exemplary compensation, cost and any relief deemed appropriate by the court.
Taken from The Star
PAS should be known as Parti Ajaran Sesat because the majority of its leaders are the cohorts of the communists.
They would go to the extend of defending the communist infidels who makes fun of the Quranic verses.
The police should haul those 2 to the jail for becoming the head for the illegal rally which makes things difficult for both the police force and the public.
Those who were caught in the rally should also be charged with assisting subversive quarters to create chaos in the country as reported by the international media that Malaysia had been in riot again on the 9th of July.
Real Muslims will not be that stupid to be used as a pawn in a game by the communist to create disharmony in the country.
Hence, it is not surprising that PAS leaders and members were in Bersih 2.0 illegal rally because even before 13th May 1969, they had been assisting the communist by slandering UMNO.
'New media used to spread lies'
PUTRAJAYA: The opposition's use of new media has enabled them to instigate sections of society to participate even in unlawful activities that give them political mileage.
Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein said this was particularly damaging as many of the issues propagated through this media channel were untrue.
Citing the illegal July 9 Bersih rally as a case in point, he said this happened despite it being clear from the start that the rally was not about pushing for free and fair elections but for the interests of parties riding on Bersih's name.
He said while the government had exhausted all its avenues to reach and explain to the people about the demonstration, it was not easy as the power hungry were willing to go the distance in pushing to attain power without going to elections.
Conceding that handling the run-up to the July 9 demonstration was difficult as the opposition had triumphed over the use of the new media, Hishammuddin said the ruling government must catch up on their use of the medium.
"I must admit that they are better than us and we need to get our act together in using the new media."
"It couldn't be clearer that there are quarters who would not hesitate to seize any opportunity and compromise everything for their narrow political ambitions.
"We knew that there may have been other groups that might have used Bersih as a platform to cause even more upheavals," he said.
Touching on police action on the day the streets of Kuala Lumpur came to a stand-still, he said the police were very restrained on July 9, despite their standard operating procedure, which allowed them to take sterner action.
On the repercussions and lessons to be learned by those arrested and released by the police every time street demonstrations are held, he said those taken in by the police would have their particulars recorded in the police system.
He said while focus was given to those behind such events, the police were not going to pick and choose demonstrators in the middle of chaos.
"What we have in Malaysia, most people outside would look at it as something that we should cherish ... Unfortunately, there are people in Malaysia, who do not appreciate what we have.
"They go the extra mile to get attention, but sometimes, when they do so, there may be a cost to it as seen in many cases. A democracy with a single racial composition will not have this problem, but in a multiracial country like ours, our leaders must be very careful."
Hishammuddin said the police were also looking at best practices in the new social landscape.
This, he said included the amendments to the country's preventive laws, the Police Acts, particularly on peaceful assemblies, as well as the use of biometrics in addressing the issues raised by the opposition on phantom voters.
Taken from New Straits Times
Don't talk much you warning Minister. You are only good in giving warning.
Where is the I.S.A.? Why hasn't the I.S.A. been used to catch those subversive elements in PSM?
PSM is just another name for the Parti Komunis Malaya (PKM) which had been disbanded.
PSM. PKM. What is the difference? PSM is PKM which had been rebranded to cover up their true intentions.
The Malays who supports the communists in DAP and PSM are imbeciles.
I advice you to watch Jejak Rasul on TV3 to watch for yourself how the Russian communist before disallowed Muslims to use the mosque or to practice Islam.
Supporting communists means that you are putting Islam behind and you are a traitor of your own race.
DAP loves stupid Malays to support them because the same stupid Malays are the ones who will destroy Islam and Muslim unity in Malaysia.
The opposition had been using the alternative media since Al Juburi had been charged with the 1st sodomy case so no wonder in the 12th General Election they reap the rewards.
The government had been too slow in countering back the baseless accusations made by the opposition.
Moreover, people love to read and BELIEVE lies and rumours as compared to facts and figures which shows us how lacking they are actually in the grey matter.
Sodomy II: Two witnesses refuse to be interviewed in Anwar’s presence
By REENA RAJ
KUALA LUMPUR: The two witnesses, who turned up at the court Tuesday morning to be interviewed by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's defence team, chose not to be interviewed in Anwar's presence.
Anwar's lead counsel, Karpal Singh told reporters that former Inspector General Police, Tan Sri Musa Hassan and former Malacca CPO Datuk Mohd Rodwan Mohd Yusof had refused to be interviewed in Anwar's presence.
"Normally, the presence of the accused is allowed. This is the first time such a thing has happened," he said.
High Court judge, Justice Datuk Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah, will meet the defence and prosecution team in chambers at 9.30am Wednesday over the matter.
Taken from The Star
The two witnesses should come forward in the trial and informed the public the truth about the facts gathered by the police and military intelligence about how Anwar became a traitor to his own nation.
It should be a death blow to Al Juburi for calling those 2 forward.
If Al Juburi is in China, surely he will be shoot to death by the firing squad for becoming the CIA agent.
Malaysia should consider having similar laws.
I am sure those 2 are only afraid that they will hit Al Juburi as what Tan Sri Rahim Noor had done when Al Juburi called him a dog.
Just imagine if you are questioning a traitor of this country and he called you a dog when he is a scabby dog.
I am sure you guys will beat him up to a pulp as well because if it were me, I would beat him until he is admitted to the ICU.
Banting murders: Suspect tells court cops tortured him, pinched his genitals
By NURBAITI HAMDAN
SHAH ALAM: An accused in the murder trial of cosmetics millionaire Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya and three others claimed that he was physically tortured, including being held at gunpoint and threatened with death, the High Court heard.
Farm hand T. Thilaiyalagan, 20, said that Chief Inspector N. Govindan had put a gun in his mouth and forced him to admit murdering four people.
"I did not admit (to the murders)," he said here Monday.
Thilaiyalagan further claimed he was forced to follow Chief Insp Govindan, the interrogating officer, to a river.
Chief Insp Govindan allegedly said "If you don't follow me, I'll shoot" to the farm hand.
Thilaiyalagan is the first witness testifying in a second trial-within-a-trial to determine his state of mind when he gave a statement to the police that led to the discovery of items in the case.
He had earlier alleged being oppressed into giving the statement and Justice Akhtar Tahir allowed the trial-within-a-trial as applied by the defence.
During an examination-in-chief by his lawyer Gurbachan Singh, Thilaiyalagan said the police kicked and pinched his genitals several times.
The torture, he claimed, took place during an interrogation at a lockup in IPD Gombak on Sept 11, last year.
He was arrested three days before (Sept 9, 2010) at a farm in Tanjung Sepat where he worked.
He also claimed that he saw two other accused, R. Matan, 21, and R. Kathavarayan, 31, bleeding as a result of being beaten by the police.
Thilaiyalagan, Matan and Kathavarayan, along with former lawyer N. Pathmanabhan, 42, claimed trial to the murders of Sosilawati, 47, her driver Kamaruddin Shamsuddin, 44, bank officer Noorhisham Mohammad, 38, and Ahmad Kamil, 32.
Hearing continues Tuesday.
Taken from The Star
Criminals will not admit to their crimes if they are not tortured.
So, if you don't want to be tortured, don't be a murderous criminal who beat someone senseless with a baseball bat, stabbed them, burned them with cow dung and threw their ashes into the river.
I am sure the opposition communists will defend these criminals because the true fact is that they are that as well.
The communists also murdered the police and their family in Bukit Kepong. So what? Now the police can also act brutal towards murderous criminals and communist and communists cohorts in Bersih.
Will the criminals admit to their crime if they were given 5 star hotel treatment?
Those murderous criminals are heartless bastards so the police have to be just as cruel.
If the police are nice like the transvestite, surely the criminals will kill them instead.
So, I am all for the police brutality because I am not a criminal and will kill a criminal who attacks me in defence too.
Aye to the police brutality against the criminals because even snatch thieves don't care if their victims crack their head on the tarred road.
Apocryphalist: Di mana betulnya Dr Asri, dan di mana salahnya
Part 2.
Didalam memuji keluhan yang dilahirkan oleh as-sahibus Samahah mantan Mufti Perlis dalam hal pengagihan zakat yang menjerumus kepada pengemisan beberapa orang ibu tunggal ke pihak gereja, kesalan saya pula ialah yang berikut: Pendirian Tuan sangat playsafe, ambigous dan tidak mempunyai "Ooomph" yang cukup, yang sabit dengan kedudukan Tuan sebagai ulamak yang disanjung ramai.
Dalam menangani hal yang sangat runcing ini pun, kenyataan Tuan, yang walaupun zahirnya neutral, sebenarnya sangat berbau politik. Tuan masih juga mahu konar sana sini dalam memandu isu ini seolah-olah Tuan mahu juga menyabitkan UMNO dan kerajaan sebagai yang bersalah. Ya, isu pengagihan zakat memang perlu dikaji secara terperinci. Dan ya, kalaulah tidak kerana pendedahan masalah ibu tunggal ini, kita mungkin tidak mempersoalkan pengagihan zakat. Tetapi Tuan gagal (atau sengaja menggagalkan) untuk melihat bahawa walaupun itu mungkin punca yang sekunder, tidak siapa tahu bahawa ianya menjerumus kepada apa yang terjadi sekarang.
Apa yang menjadi MASAALAH primer atau yang unggul sekarang bukannya itu: MASAALAH yang benar-benar tegar yang menjadi batu penghalang kepada kemajuan untuk meyelesaikan masaalah ini ialah polisi PAS dan orang-orang Islam yang, demi membenci kerajaannya sendiri, sanggup untuk tidak mencemuh pihak gereja. Demi perpaduan dengan kafir harbi yang mungkin boleh menjanjikan segelintir-dua undi, PAS sangup untuk menjaga hati mereka. Sanggup untuk memarahi Hassan Ali. Sanggup bersekongkol dangan pihak kerajaan PKR dalam MENUTUP MULUT supaya hal ini tidak tersebar lua. Bukankah biasanya hal-hal tutup mulut ini adalah apabila sesuatu benda yang benar berlaku?
Bersekongkol juga kah yang Mulia as-Sahibus Samahah dengan pendirian ini? Sedikit pun tidak Tuan kritik pihak gereja. Sedikit pun tidak Tuan puji hasil usaha pihak JAIS membongkar usaha pemurtadan ini. Malahan kalau tersilap baca, akan dapat dianggarkan bahawa bukan saja Tuan tidak memuji, malahan mereka turut Tuan marahi juga. Maka terkontang-kantinglah Dr Hassan Ali serta JAIS dalam hal ini, seolah-olah dalam hal-hal menjaga Akidah Islam, kita hanya bergantung kepada mereka dan Tuan tidak ada langsung dalam gambaran. Nak harapkan siapa lagi? Khalid Samad? Nama Allah dijualnya, Kilang Carlsberg diresmikannya? Padahal sebelum berkuasa dahulu, untuk menegakkan syiar ugamalah yang menjadi slogan pencalonannya. Ada Tuan bising kerana dengan pengambilan tampok pemerintahan, lesen arak, lesen judi dan lesen menubuh rumah urut ternaik 2-3 kali ganda di Selangor?
Saya perhatikan Tuan sangat "playsafe" dalam segala isu politik-ugama, terutama sekali jika isu itu terjatuh kedalam kategori yang sangat rumit ... yakni jika ianya sesuatu yang perlu di juangkan oleh pihak Islam tetapi didapati tidak disenangi oleh kumpulan kafir dalam Pakatan Rakyat dan sebaliknya dijuangkan oleh pihak UMNO pula. Contohnya isu Bersih. Dan Isu Yoga. Dan Isu tarian Poco-poco. Bingung kami semua membaca pendirian Tuan. Dah terang-terangan Yoga itu ada yang terdapat memerlukan pengamalnya membaca beberapa mantra tertentu, masih juga Tuan mahu konar sana sini. Tuan mahu me-neutralisekan diri Tuan. Tuan mahu dikasihi oleh semua orang, terutama sekali oleh mereka-mereka yang membenci Islam. Tuan mahu dilutekan hujjah haram-halal bagi memberi ruang kepada mereka-mereka yang pro untuk berada dalam satu denominator yang sama dengan yang con. Orang macam Tuanlah yang akan dicari oleh Marina Mahathir, Sisters-in-Islam dan lain lain yang sentiasa mencari dan mempelopori idea-idea yang sangat bertentangan dengan Islam. Pernah Tuan tegur Marina Mahathir? Pernah Tuan cuba memperbetulkan ahli-ahli Sisters-in-Islam yang terang-terangan mencabar perintah Allah SWT? Pernah?
Yang pernah saya baca dan yang selalu Tuan buat hanyalah mengkritik JAIS. Atau Badan ugama kerajaan. Atau UMNO. Saya syak ini semua adalah kerana mereka-mereka ini semua terdiri dari pengunjung sekolah-sekolah pondok atau tempat pengajian kelasik seperti Mesir dan timur tengah dan Tuan berasa terdapat sedikit kelebihan superior dalam ijazah PhD Tuan dalam agama. Jadi Tuan mahu menampilkan idea seorang PhD yang kononnya terkeluar dari skop pemikiran sempit yang dipunyai kebanyakkan pelajar Islam secara kelasik yang lain.. Adakah mungkin kerana semua ini? Secara subliminal, secara halus dan tidak disedari, ini semua menjadi musabbab kepada kenapa Tuan berkelakuan dan berpendapat seolah-olah tidak mahu langsung bersama-sama mereka yang cuba mempertahankan akidah Islam. Adakah mungkin benar terkaan saya ini?
Tuan disanjung tinggi oleh Marian Mahathir. Tahu kah Tuan secara terperinci akidah beliau? Tuan menjadi reference kepada Syed Akbar Ali yang, menurut Haris Ibrahim, menganggap Kaabah itu sebagai satu batu sembahan yang tidak ubah seperti penyembahan Sanam oleh pihak Jahiliyyah. Adakah ini orang-orang yang menjadi sahabat Tuan? Adakah untuk menjaga hati orang-orang yang begini maka sanggup Tuan "disown" JAIS dan badan ugama lain? Mahu sangatkah Tuan dipuji oleh Teresa Kok atau Ronnie Liu atau pihak Gereja dengan harga mencemuh kumpulan dan jabatan Islam sendiri?
Pernah Omar Khayyam mengeluh dan bersya'ir sedemikian:
Terdapat suatu ketika dahulu di mana
Kota ini mencerminkan putaran bintang-bintang di langit
Betapa ramai anak-anak raja yang tersungkur di hadapannya
Tetapi sekarang ini,
terdapat seekor merpati bertenggekan di atasnya.
Kalau Tuan terus menerus menyapu yang bathil ke bawah tikar semata-mata untuk menjaga hati dan perpaduan rapuh dengan si kafir Harbi, Tuan sendirilah orangnya yang menjadi pemangkin ke atas runtuhnya kota ini.
Apocryphalist
