Will Prof Emeritus Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim please stand up?

Mohd Khalid Hussin (left) and Duyung History and Malay Heritage Association member Mohd Hani Bok inspecting the lineage record which detailed names of Tun Perak’s descendants

'Hang Tuah was my forefather'

Mohd Khalid Husin claims he is a descendant of legendary warrior Hang Tuah

KUALA LUMPUR : THE saying "do not anger your ancestors" carries extra weight for Mohd Khalid Husin as one of his distant forefathers was none other than the legendary warrior, Hang Tuah , or so he claims.

Khalid, 50, claimed that he and with his relatives were the descendants of Tun Perak, who was Hang Tuah's father-in-law.

"My late grandmother told me when I was a boy that our family was descendants from these historical figures."

Khalid, who lived in the same village as Hang Tuah (Kampung Duyung), said it was through word of mouth that the knowledge of his family's lineage was preserved.

He claimed that after Malacca had fallen to the Portuguese in 1511, the immediate family members of high-ranking officials, such as Bendahara Tun Perak and Hang Tuah, fled to avoid persecution.

"The Portuguese soldiers would kill anyone they believed to be Hang Tuah's kin, including those who were affiliated with Tun Perak.

"Those who remained kept the memories of their forefathers alive through word of mouth."

Khalid's family had also kept a salasilah or a lineage record, which detailed their ancestors' names.

"There are almost 100 names on our salasilah, starting with Tun Sedang followed by Tun Kudu, Tun Perak and Tun Perpatih Puteh.

"My late grandmother's name is Haji Puteh," he told the New Straits Times yesterday.

Khalid claimed that the original salasilah was finally written down in document-form during the British colonial era, and that the one they had constantly updated was only a copy.

Khalid had also formed the Persatuan Sejarah dan Warisan Melayu Duyung, or Duyung History and Malay Heritage Association (Pesawad) in 2010, which he is the president of, in the hope to locate others who were also the descendants of Hang Tuah and Tun Perak.

"Hang Tuah was married and had children.

"After more than 500 years, there is bound to be a number of us scattered around the region."

He said he had met with the others from all over the country, including Selangor, Johor and Singapore, adding that sometimes if the "connection was strong" between a seemingly distant relative, the sensation from a mere handshake was enough to convince him that the other person was also a blood kin.

He also alleged that some of his cousins and extended family members had kept heirlooms -- trinkets and artifacts -- from the days of the Malaccan Sultanate.

"My cousin, who is also a descendant living in Singapore, has an old kris, which he said was passed from generation to generation after Tun Perak."

Khalid also said that his grandfather had a copy of an "original" Hikayat Hang Tuah (The Hang Tuah Epic).

"It was passed down from one generation to another, before my grandfather got his hands on it."

Khalid said that, however, his grandfather had given the artifact to his brother in 1936.

"The contents were written in Jawi and the book was very old."

When asked where was the book now, he claimed that his cousin had "given" the artifact to the National Archives because its condition was deteriorating.

Khalid said he had announced his claims to members of the public when he formed Pesawad, but, so far, no one had come forward to investigate or argue with him with regards to Hang Tuah's existence.

"I welcome historians or academics to come and study or debate my family's lineage."

The New Straits Times, 28th January 2012

I hope the loud mouthed Prof Emeritus Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim will take up the challenge. Or is he afraid of the truth that might be revealed if he does take up the challenge?

Since he is so adamant that the whole thing is a myth, he should not be afraid to prove that it is a myth and not something real.

Any Malay historians or academicians willing to study Mohd Khalid Husin claims? This is your chance to prove that Prof Emeritus Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim is wrong when he made statements that Hang Tuah is a myth.

Does Hang Tuah Exist?

Archaeologist defends Hang Tuah's existence

KUALA LUMPUR Jan 20 — An archaeologist today defended the existence of Hang Tuah, pointing out that although no specific studies had been done on the matter, he was convinced that the legendary warrior was not a mythical figure.

Malaysian Archaeologists Association president Prof Emeritus Datuk Dr Nik Hassan Shuhaimi Nik Abdul Rahman said studies concerning the warrior and his four peers could still proceed despite the views that Hang Tuah might be a mythical figure.

"I believe that he existed but we can”t be sure of the era; if we look at the Hang Tuah tales, he existed during the era of a sultanate. The name ”Hang” does indeed exist in the Malay world.

"However, further studies on his four peers (Hang Jebat, Hang Kasturi, Hang Lekir and Hang Lekiu) maybe needed. The name ”Hang” exists in Padang Lawas Sumatra, Indonesia.” He said that although there had been no specific studies carried out on the matter, indirect ones indicated that the warrior did indeed exist.

"And then there is also the Hang Tuan tomb. We can”t deny that it is not.

Although there is no specific name written on it, it is from the 15th century,” he told reporters at a convention on the Malay cultural roots here today.

Historian Prof Emeritus Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim had previously said that Hang Tuah might be mythical and that there were no strong evidence to proof the warrior”s existence.

Dr Nik Hassan said DNA tests on the remains in the tomb might prove to be difficult due to religious sensitivities.

"This is a Muslim tomb. We don”t want to disturb this tomb because there may be sensitivities involved in terms of religion. We can perform tests on pre-historic findings,” he said.

— BERNAMA

The above statement was issued in contrast due to a related statement given by Prof Emeritus Tan Sri Khoo Kay Kim in The Star dated 16th January 2012 [Click here], 17th January 2012 [Click here], 18th January 2012 [Click here] and 19th January 2012 [Click here].

I am unsure of whom to believe in the above rebutting statements but if you go and visit Malacca and search for historical [click here] places there, you will find it possible to find Hang Li Po well, the grave of Hang Tuah, the grave of Hang Jebat, the grave of Hang Kasturi and the grave of Tun Teja amongst other many historical places as well.

Therefore, how can one say that those figures are mythical figures and are not real? Futhermore, Hang Tuah is even mentioned in Sejarah Melayu although it was deemed 'Hikayat Hang Tuah' or the story of Hang Tuah.

So to conclude, I think I believe what I can see because I can see the well and the graves of the so-called mythical figure rather than what is being propogated by the good Prof because everybody will be opposing to something all the time even though there are proof of the existence of the said myths.

What is the opinion of my beloved readers? I am sure you have a thing or two to say about this matter...


.