NOTA UNTUK PM DARI BLOGGERS PRO UMNO!

NOTA UNTUK PM DARI BLOGGERS PRO UMNO!

Saturday, July 2, 2011

Politicians are hypocritical

On the 28th of June 2011, Datuk Ibrahim Ali, Perkasa leader had turned up at the Dang Wangi district police headquarters to have his statement to be recorded for about 2 hours with a probe under the Sedition Act for the alleged statement he made against Malaysian Chinese in addition to a rally that is planned to oppose the illegal Bersih 2.0.

Meanwhile, Anwar Ibrahim, the Pakatan Rakyat leader and Khairy Jamalluddin, the Umno Youth chief are among a dozen people that is expected to be called up by the police to have their statements recorded over the rallies planned for 9th July by Bersih 2.0, Perkasa and Umno Youth.

Bersih 2.0 chairman Ambiga Sreenevasan arrived with her lawyers N. Surendran, Fadaih Nadwa Fikri and several supporters. Ambiga is a lawyer, so surely she knew how to manipulate the law to side with her. Lawyers have always been known to explicate criminals from their criminal charges on the defense of technicality.

Just like what Karpal Singh had done when he :

1. On 22-10-1997 Parliamentary session, YB Karpal Singh accused the then Deputy PM, YB Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, was involved in sodomy.

2. Sometime in the early part of 1998, YB Karpal Singh proudly proclaimed in the DAP Ceramah in the Federal Hotel that he had evidence in his hand that the then Deputy PM was involved in sodomy.

But now, proving himself a first class hypocrite, he became Anwar's defence attorney because of the political pact of Pakatan Rakyat where PAS, PKR and DAP are joined together with a sole aim of bringing down Barisan Nasional.

This means that he does not have any honour at all and will do whatever it takes to defend someone that he had accused of being a homosexual and indulges in sodomy.

As Anwar Ibrahim had been jailed for bribery and sodomy, siding with him means that the opposition pact approves of his wrong doings and criminal acts.

Inciting people to go for illegal demonstrations for the Bersih 2.0 is a pure criminal act and should be charged for incitement of rioting. The Election Commission had opened their doors to Bersih for a peaceful discussion but Bersih chooses to go for an illegal demonstration in the streets.

This is a blatant prove that Bersih had a hidden agenda to create chaos in the country and it is not to ask for a free and fair election because if the elections are not free and fair, do you honestly think that the opposition could have wrestle 5 states from Barisan Nasional?

Not only people will be afraid to go out to the city that day which happens to be the weekend, shop owners have to close up their shops in case rioting occurs and profits from their business will dip.

Taxi drivers will lose their customers and the country will lose money from the tourism industry because tourists will be afraid to come to Malaysia in July because they are anticipating chaos because of the riot that could occur on that day.

So, everyone loses out and the minority in Bersih wins because they are traitors who had been incited by the number one traitor of this country, Anwar Ibrahim, the CIA agent who turns out to be the most foolish one ever recruited by CIA since his cover is blown.

2 comments:

  1. No doubt bro.. BN too, saved some space for such behavior in its organizations. But Pakatan has the most practise... That why we called politics.. hehehehe.... Nobody can sustained as a dumb straight leader, play innocent in brutal war to win the game. Mufti pun kena.. Sultan pun kena... What more to say politican. kan?

    ReplyDelete
  2. So bro Apai Ngelai. What has to change is that we have to have clean politicians who are not involved in any scandals.

    The motherfuckers who are known by people to give bribes have to go.

    ReplyDelete

Say whatever that is on your mind. Heck! This is a free country after all. If the racists Chinese can swear at the Malays as much as they want, we can do that as well.

However, I will not be held responsible to whatever that you have to say. The comment is solely the private opinion of the author.