Desperate people makes desperate stories

Before we believe anything, we should investigate both sides of the story and we should not be biased if some accusations are made without any solid proof.

Therefore, before we believe the fairy tale of the so-called romantic liaison between Saiful Bukhari and deputy public prosecutor Farah Azlina Latif, we should give it a benefit of a doubt.

Is there any CCTV recording, DNA swab or photos of the liaison as in Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy case 2?

To the avid supporter of Anwar Ibrahim, how could you believe 100% what Anwar Ibrahim said without giving it the benefit of a doubt? You would rather believe some wild accusation that does not provide any proof rather than the proof in Anwar Ibrahim sodomy case 2?

Maybe even after you yourself are sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim, you will deny it and still thinks he is an angel sent to help the people when all the while whatever he had done was to save his own ass.

We know that human nature can never change. Therefore, if he had been charged once for sodomising someone else, he could do it again later since it is in his nature to do it.

For example, a drug addict that had been sent to a rehabilitation centre, after getting out of there, if he still mingle around his drug addict counterpart, he will become a drug addict again.

Even if Saiful Bukhari have a relationship with Farah Azlina Latif, what has that got to do with Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy case of sodomising Saiful Bukhari?

Those are two different things and are not related at all. This had just been made up to show the desperation of Anwar Ibrahim to get this case dismissed.

Shows how much he is scared since the real truth is that he did sodomise Saiful Bukhari.

If someone is so desperate to save Anwar Ibrahim, maybe Khairy Jamaluddin could make a statement that he was with Anwar Ibrahim at the time of the alleged sodomy.