Let us remember what had caused the 13th May 1969 riot. Malay must not forget. The culprit behind it wants the Malays to forget so that they can do it all over again.
E mail me any info about DAP, PAS and PKR at:
life.is.not.a.fairy.tale.dude@gmail.com
This is the analysis from Time after the incident of 13th May 1969.
Western observers such as Time attributed the racial enmities to a political and economic system, which primarily benefited the upper classes:“ The Chinese and Indians resented Malay-backed plans favoring the majority, including one to make Malay the official school and government language. The poorer, more rural Malays became jealous of Chinese and Indian prosperity. Perhaps the Alliance's greatest failing was that it served to benefit primarily those at the top. ... For a Chinese or Indian who was not well-off, or for a Malay who was not well-connected, there was little largesse in the system. Even for those who were favored, hard feelings persisted. One towkay recently told a Malay official: "If it weren't for the Chinese, you Malays would be sitting on the floor without tables and chairs." Replied the official: "If I knew I could get every damned Chinaman out of the country, I would willingly go back to sitting on the floor.
This is what is happening in Thailand now when the armed forces had to impose a curfew due to the abandonment of the Red Shirt demonstrators who are anti government.
"But the rioting and fires continue to sweep the city. An 8pm curfew has been imposed in the city tonight to restore order."
We, as peace loving Malaysians rejects any form of violent outbreak by any quarters. We do not want a curfew imposed by the Thai security forces to happen here as well. And it could happen if the racism by the ultra kiasu party is left unchecked.
Do we want this to happen to Malaysia?
Read this excerpt on how the 13th May 1969 occur. It occured because of the arrogance of the ultra kiasu that cast mockery at the Malays just because they had won quite a substantial number of seats in the General Election held on 10 May 1969.
On 12 May, thousands of Chinese marched through Kuala Lumpur, parading through predominantly Malay areas, hurling insults which led to the incident. The largely Chinese opposition Democratic Action Party and Gerakan gained in the elections, and secured a police permit for a victory parade through a fixed route in Kuala Lumpur. However, the rowdy procession deviated from its route and headed through the Malay district of Kampung Baru, jeering at the inhabitants. Some demonstrators carried brooms, later alleged to symbolise the sweeping out of the Malays from Kuala Lumpur, while others chanted slogans about the "sinking" of the Alliance boat — the coalition's logo. The Gerakan party issued an apology on May 13 for their rally goers' behaviour.
If we don't want a repeat of this bloody 13th May, the racists statement that is uttered by the ultra kiasu leaders should be stopped in whatever way we must do to ensure the prosperity of our country to continue to flourish without any fear in the hearts of the people. Malays are not like those ultra kiasu who don't have any manners.
Now we are still putting up with the pressure and the provocation from the ultra kiasu party and their accomplice, but let me remind you that even a little kitten if it is being abused everyday to a boiling point, it will scratch out at you to defend itself. Please continue with the provocation but remember that you have to bear the consequences when the Malays have lost their temper and run amok like Hang Jebat.
No other country in this world had given so much to their minority as much as the Malays had given to the minority in this country. So take heed of my warning. When you have an axe to grind, until you had to come up with an ethnic cleansing bull, when the minority Chinese is controlling the economy of Malaysia, and every minority in this country have their own rights, why are you beating around the bush?
Drastic times call for drastic measures. That is why we have PERKASA to defend the Malays from the ultra kiasu. The minorities have many parties to defend their rights like DAP, Gerakan, MCA, MIC and many more. Maybe it's time for the Malays to have a new party that is ultra Malay and fights for the rights of the Malay since UMNO is heading the wrong way and helping the minorities which are the real masters of the economy of our nation.
Last but not least, I flip the bird at all the ultra kiasu and their cohorts. If you don't understand what flip the bird means, look it up in Google.
If that is true, maybe MCA and Gerakan are the parties that are being rejected by the Chinese. Therefore, our Prime Minister should think of ways how we can persuade the Chinese to give their support to the BN again.
“We are confident that under the leadership of the Prime Minister, who is a good listener, the government policies will reflect the wishes of the rakyat, including the Chinese,” MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek said at press conference after having a dialogue with several automotive parts manufacturing associations at Wisma MCA here yesterday.
“A lot of Chinese businessmen have said that some government officers have too much discretionary powers.
“For example, on the liberalisation of various sectors, certain government officers still impose 30% bumiputra quota on licensing and permits. I think there is a need to be more consultative in our approach especially when it comes to implementation and introducing new policies,” he said.
“The more we react (to Ibrahim), the more important he becomes. We should not fall into this trap.
“Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak is the one we should look forward to lead this nation, not Ibrahim Ali,” he said.
That was the excerpts from the interview published in The Star titled, "Chua: Chinese have deeper concern for intellectual issues" dated 19th May 2010.
Look at what this intellectual individual has done. Chua is so intellectual that he would risk a scandal for emphasizing the usage of his joystick more than his gray matter. And the MCA delegation who had voted him as the MCA president is, oh so learned, that they would be that low as to assign someone with an aspersion for fornication with a mistress rather than putting in a more reputable leader as the boss of MCA.
They are so intellectual. I am aghast at the brilliance of the mentality of the leaders in MCA. That is why the Chinese community is running away like they had seen a ghost when they see anyone from MCA. Remember that the voice of the MCA delegates does not represent the majority of the Chinese people. Even though the Chinese community might find it okay for the Chinese people to be indulging in sex outside of marriage as proven by Eli Wong, that does not mean that they want a leader with that kind of attitude in BN.
Let me remind you of a report in The Star, dated 2nd January 2008 titled "Chua resigns after sex scandal" about this scandalous affair that might had been forgotten by Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek himself since he does not have too much to think about the reputation of the MCA being led by someone like him. Proves that he is not so intellectual after all.
Chua is not only unintelligible, he is also senile since he had forgotten the Malay Supremacy bashing he had put up in his blog. It makes him not much better than the leaders from the ultra kiasu party.
I.S.A. What is I.S.A.? Ikut suka akulah. This is my blog. I can damn well rant and rave about whatever I want. I am one of the bloggers that supports I.S.A. whole heartedly. Those who are against the I.S.A. can go back to the communist sewer from which you crawed out from. I will bash out at all ultra kiasu Chinese as much as I want to. You are not the only one who have something to say. I have loads of things to get out of my chest.
I.S.A. is the Internal Security Act. Every country in this world have their own version of the I.S.A. to maintain the peace inside the country. It may be called I.S.A. or others such as the Anti Terrorist Act (ATA) in the United States of America produced not surprisingly just after 9/11. It is also known as the USA Patriot Act. The contrived acronym stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. So what is the fuss about abolishing this Act when it is nothing more than a preventive detention law that is enforced in Malaysia?
Why are some people up to no good so afraid of I.S.A. that there are even some quarters like GMI and Suaram that are so against it? GMI stands for Gerakan Mansuhkan ISA. GMI is in the same website as Suaram. Suaram stands for Suara Rakyat Malaysia. Well, you are not making a stand for the whole of Malaysia. There are still many out there that are for I.S.A. GMI and Suaram are nothing more than the tools created and used by the opposition parties to demand the abolishment of I.S.A. I am sure that if ever (God forbids) the ultra kiasu DAP ruled Malaysia, they will impose a harsher law than the I.S.A. Communists will be communists. No doubt about that.
The I.S.A. in Malaysia is called The Internal Security Act 1960 or in Malay as "Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri". It is a preventive detention law in force in Malaysia. The legislation was enacted after Malaysia gained independence from Britain in 1957. The ISA allows for detention without trial or criminal charges under limited, legally defined circumstances.
China have their own security measures set up for their leaders. The Central Security Bureau (also called Unit 8341, and less commonly, Unit 57001) or The Central Guard Unit (sometimes as the Centralis Guard Regiment) is the chief Security Detail military bureau responsible for the security of senior Chinese government, party, and military leaders. Along with the personal safety of senior Chinese government, party, and military leaders, the bureau is also responsible for protecting the office and living quarters of the leaders.
In India, there are the Terrorism and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act 1987 and the Prevention of Terrorism Act. These were replaced by Prevention of Terrorist Activities Act (2002-04). The Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, commonly known as TADA, was an Indian law active between 1985 and 1995 (modified in 1987) for the prevention of terrorist activities in Punjab.
The United Kingdom, they have the The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (c.2). As of March 2009[update] the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 is still active, following renewal on 11 March 2009. The purpose of this Act is to provide for the making of 'control orders' imposing obligations on individuals suspected of being involved in terrorism-related activity. These are preventative orders which are designed to restrict or prevent the further involvement by individuals in such activity. More explanation about the Act can be read here.
In our neighbouring country Thailand, due to the chaos caused by the United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD), known as the Red Shirts Protestors who are anti government, in March 2010 Thailand had invoked a new Internal Security Act on Tuesday, 9th of March giving security forces broad powers to impose curfews, set up checkpoints and restrict the movement of demonstrators. The ISA allows the country's top security agency - the Internal Security Operations Command - to impose curfews, operate checkpoints and restrict the movement of demonstrators if protests by the UDD turn violent.
Singapore's Internal Security Act confers on the government the right to arrest and detain individuals without trial in certain defined circumstances. The most notable ISA case was the Operation Coldstore in 1963 which led to the arrest of some 100 left-wing politicians and trade unionists, including members of the opposition party Barisan Sosialis who were opposing Singapore's merger with Malaysia. Read about Singapore's countermeasures to terrorism here.
In conclusion, there is no need to abolish the I.S.A. as demanded by the opposition and the NGOs supporting them since they are asking that to only satisfy their own selfish needs so that they can create chaos in our country at their whims and fancies.
1. to exercise restraint or direction over; dominate; command. 2. to hold in check; curb: to control a horse; to control one's emotions. 3. to test or verify (a scientific experiment) by a parallel experiment or other standard of comparison. 4. to eliminate or prevent the flourishing or spread of: to control a forest fire. 5. Obsolete . to check or regulate (transactions), originally by means of a duplicate register.
The wikipedia defined mass media as "denotes a section of the media specifically designed to reach a large audience. The term was coined in the 1920s with the advent of nationwide radio networks, mass-circulation newspapers and magazines. However, some forms of mass media such as books and manuscripts had already been in use for centuries. Mass media includes Internet media (like blogs, message boards, podcasts, and video sharing) because individuals now have a means to exposure that is comparable in scale to that previously restricted to a select group of mass media producers. The communications audience has been viewed by some commentators as forming a mass society with special characteristics, notably atomization or lack of social connections, which render it especially susceptible to the influence of modern mass-media techniques such as advertising and propaganda."
The reason that I mentioned the two words together is the topic of this article which I think you might have guessed "Controlled media". Some people think that they are so high and mighty that they would blame our government for the so called controlled media. These are the opposition suckers who believe every damn lie that is spun by the opposition. Can you stop being hypocrites who pretends to be so just and naive when the opposition are doing exactly the same thing with the media that they owned? We are not mindless as you obviously think we are.
How can you justify the slanderous accusations without any solid proof by various media owned by PAS, PKR and DAP? In addition to the new media, blogs owned by the ultra kiasu leaders that will manipulate anything just to get the support of Malaysians to blind to see them for who they really are.
Let us look at the facts. The world media are controlled by the Jews. Everybody knew this for a fact. The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post are owned by Jews. Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report are owned by the Jews. The Associated Press (AP) is owned by Michael Silverman, a Jewish vice president and managing director. Disney, Viacom, Time Warner, NBC Universal and many more are the same.
Quoting from an article titled "Who Rules America?", you can read more about it here.
As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares suggest that the U.S. government is backing the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish conflict, or that 9-11 was a result of that support. Nor does anyone dare suggest that it served Jewish interests, rather than American interests, to send U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel's principal rival in the Middle East. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.
Another example is the media treatment of racial issues in the United States. Some commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting news of racial strife, while others are emotionally partisan—with the partisanship always on the non-White side. All of the media spokesmen without exception, however, take the position that "multiculturalism" and racial mixing are here to stay and that they are good things.
Can the ultra kiasu racists admit that they are Malaysians first, Chinese second? From my observation of the current situation in Malaysia, the ultra kiasu racists are certainly not that at all. They are truly Chinese. Chinese first, Malaysian second. That is why they cannot tolerate the Malays who had graciously given them the citizenship of Malaysia (used to be known as MALAYA before the Independence.) They have taken control of this country's economy, now they are becoming more and more greedy. They want to control the political power of this country too.
Here's a joke for you guys to laugh off after reading it.
There was a chinese man and a black man standing at a pond. The chinese man was standing there and told the black man, that if you skip a rock across the pond it will tell you one of you greatest ancestors. So, the chinese man skipped a rock across and the pond said, "Ching-Chang-Chee." The chinese man said that it was his great uncle. So the black man said, "let me try." So he skipped the rock and the pond said, "Chim-Pan-Zee".
Racism world-wide is manifested in every continent. In Europe, extreme racist groups have gained more and more acceptability in countries like France, Germany, and Austria. In Australia, the Aborigines have lost much of their land and have been the victim of extreme prejudice. Not only has Apartheid -- legalized separation -- been practiced in Australia, it has been a well-publicized condition in South Africa. Many African countries have endured long-term civil wars, some beginning shortly after that nation’s freedom from former colonial countries. In the Middle East, antagonism between the Israelis and the Palestinians continues to exist.
The United Nations passed Resolution 3379 on November 10, 1975, stating that "Zionism is a form of racism and discrimination."
We need to go beyond race-based politics. If you continue to harp and support this racial equation, you will never be able to overcome racial divisions. -Anwar Ibrahim, Former Deputy Prime Minister
Race based politics is the ugly truth that is happening all around the world. You can try to deny its existence but it is there. It is still rampage even in America.
Every political party in Malaysia is based on the race. So how can you propogate of being free from race based politics? For instance, let us take a look at MCA. It is the acronym for the MALAYSIAN CHINESE ASSOCIATION. What about the MIC? It stands for MALAYSIAN INDIAN CONGRESS.
Gerakan or PARTI GERAKAN RAKYAT MALAYSIA members are mostly Chinese even though it claims to be multi racial. SUPP stands for SARAWAK UNITED PEOPLE'S PARTY. DAP which is the DEMOCRATIC ACTION PARTY claims itself to be a multi racial party, but the people holding the highest posts in DAP are the Chinese.
Lim Kit Siang is the National Chairman of the Democratic Action Party. His son, Lim Guan Eng is the Democratic Action Party 5th Secretary General. If we look at the leadership of DAP for the national level, the party is being dominated by the Chinese and Indian with the exception of 2 Malays out of the total of 31, 24 are Chinese, 2 Singhs and 3 Indians.
DAP lately had been promoting Middle Malaysia. Middle Malaysia is not different at all from the objectives of the ultra kiasu party. Look at the explanation of what Middle Malaysia and the objectives of DAP as what I had put below. Middle Malaysia is just a new name of the objectives of the DAP party and it is the same as the terminology of communism.
Middle Malaysia comprised of people whose state of mind is common – the desire for national unity, justice, progress, religious freedom, quality education, job opportunities, crime free society, healthcare, rule of law, good governance that is transparent, corruption free police force and an independent judiciary. - Quote from the opposition blog
Look at the Vision and Mission of the ultra kiasu party, DAP.
Our Objectives
The vision of the party is to establish a peaceful and prosperous social democracy that can unite its disparate races and diverse religions and cultures based on:
1. a Malaysian Malaysia concept by forging Malaysian race with universal moral values,
2. offering equal access and opportunity;
3. democractic governance and rule of law;
4. creating wealth and distributing wealth equitably; and
5. fighting against corruption.
Compare it to the terminology of communism as defined in Wikipedia.
Communism is a social structure in which classes are abolished and property is commonly controlled, as well as a political philosophy and social movement that advocates and aims to create such a society. "Pure communism" in the Marxian sense refers to a classless, stateless and oppression-free society where decisions on what to produce and what policies to pursue are made democratically, allowing every member of society to participate in the decision-making process in both the political and economic spheres of life.
This quote is taken from "The Thirteen Million Plus Ringgit" Guy Rambles... . "It seems that the Chinese Chauvinist DAP is changing its tone of ’Malaysian, Malaysia’ to woo the ’silent majority’ for votes, which rest in the hands of the Malay majority. They are now promoting ‘Middle Malaysia’, as a new battle-cry in the hope that the Malays are now felt being championed by the Chinese Chauvinist DAP, which in the over 40 years tried very hard to undermine the needs of the majority."
In conclusion, there is no such thing as begone with the race based politics, when the individual parties in Malaysia are fighting for the rights of their own race.
“The Chinese voters didn't appreciate what has been given by the Prime Minister to them, for example, his support for vernacular schools and so on.
“The Chinese voters openly supported the DAP policies. The Chinese voters want their own ways to prevail, despite the bumiputras having to 'swallow' the Barisan Nasional's call for compromise to allow the Chinese community to have their wish,” he said here yesterday.
That was the quote taken from The Star in an article titled "Ibrahim labels Chinese as ungrateful".
On 13th December 2009, Dr Mohd Ridhuan Tee Abdullah had this to say about the Malay Supremacy.
The word Malay supremacy does not directly reflect the relationship between a 'master' and its 'slave' as claimed by the ultra kiasu group. If the non-Malay is slave, how the non-Malay has the economic dominance leaving behind the Malay Muslims? Read more. Is there such a thing as Malay supremacy?
I had also written an article that answered some questions from an Indian reader who said that I was shallow in my articles that I had written about what I think DAP is. Surely Mr Prashant Thayaparan believes in upholding the human rights in Malaysia? For example, the right to express the freedom of speech. Don't go harping around about the freedom of speech when you cannot accept someone else expressing their views that are totally different from yours?
Do I need to teach you about the constitution of Malaysia? I am sure you are not that stupid as you acted out to be. Below are the Article 10 of the Constitution of Malaysia.
Article 10 (1) guarantees the freedom of speech, the right to assemble peacefully and the right to form associations to every Malaysian citizen. However, Parliament may by law impose restrictions on these rights in the interest of the security of the Federation, friendly relations with other countries, public order, morality; and restrictions designed to protect the privileges of Parliament, to provide against contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to any offence.
You can read more about the Constitution of Malaysia here if you are so blind about the history of Malaysia.
The Chinese in Gerakan are just the same as in DAP since Dr Koh Tsu Koon had come out with a statement questioning Malay Supremacy in Dec 1st 2008 in an article by NST titled "Koh: Malay supremacy not in Constitution".
He said the question of ketuanan Melayu (Malay supremacy) did not arise as it was not contained in the Federal Constitution.
It is the same with Dr. Chua Soi Lek from MCA. He had written an article in his blog, questioning the continuance of the Malay Supremacy. These are the excerpts from that article.
If the Malays insist on “Ketuanan Melayu” (Malay Supremacy) and that they are supreme in this country, they should not be worried about the advancement by non-Malays since in their mind, they are always supreme. Problems arise because in order to be supreme, they want the non-Malays not to advance. Read here
It seems like Gerakan and MCA, 2 of the Chinese parties that are the component parties in Barisan Nasional is not much different from the racists DAP ultra kiasu.
On 2nd May 2010, PAS the number one traitor of the Malays and the Islamic religion had this to say. PAS secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali said that PAS did not subscribe to "Ketuanan Melayu" and that Islam did not recognise race-based supremacy. "We don't subscribe to Ketuanan Melayu," he told The Malaysian Insider.
Wikipedia defined "Ketuanan Melayu" as Ketuanan Melayu (Malay for Malay supremacy or Malay dominance[1]) is the claim that the Malay people are the tuan (masters) of Malaysia.
Personally, I don't think that it is the right definition. "Ketuanan Melayu" is not Malay supremacy per se. What is so supreme about the Malays when the economy in Malaysia is controlled by the minority Chinese racists?
"There is no such thing as Ketuanan Melayu. We are the underdog."
"The shoe-polisher is not the tuan (master). The man who pays you is the Tuan. I used to have a Chinese driver, he called me Tuan," he quipped.
That is the quote by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad from an article titled "There is no Ketuanan Melayu without parity." Need I say more?
Imam Abdul Ra’uf writes in yesterday’s Washington Post, “Certainly history has shown that religion and politics can be dangerous things to mix. But we believe that if the highest ethics of religion are mixed with politics rooted in justice, the combination can be positively powerful and extremely effective.” Quote from Read here
“Allah converted me to Islam when I was five years old, and again through a religious experience when I was 21, but I did not know there were other persons in the world who understood what Allah showed me until I met an old man in Bahrain who told me that there is a word for what I worshipped, and this is "Allah." I figured that all Muslims could not be bad, as I had thought before, if this man was so good and was an admitted Muslim. I did not choose to become a Muslim. I am and have always been a Muslim, but did not know it self-consciously until I was 50 years old.”-Robert D. Crane- American Lawyer and Foreign Policy Advisor
This deliberate perversion of Islam into an alleged totalitarian ideology like Communism has been bought hook, line, and sinker by many academics in universities, who are responsible for the preparation of policy paradigms, by most of the think-tanks, who rely on the expertise of academia to set the agenda for policy in Washington, and by all of Bush’s close Neo-Con associates, who make and implement policy in pursuit of a totalitarian utopia with total disregard for either Congress or the American people. Read more here
Islam (PAS- I am yawning) and communism (DAP) cannot come together. That is the point that I wish to emphasis here. Below are the definition of Islam and communism.
The literal meaning of Islam is peace; surrender of one’s will i.e. losing oneself for the sake of God and surrendering one’s own pleasure for the pleasure of God. Read more
Wikipedia describe the etymology and meaning of Islam as: "The word Islam is a verbal noun originating from the triliteral root s-l-m, and is derived from the Arabic verb Aslama, which means "to accept, surrender or submit." Thus, Islam means acceptance of and submission to God, and believers must demonstrate this by worshiping him, following his commands, and avoiding polytheism."
The description of polytheism by Wikipedia: "Polytheism is the belief in and/or worship of multiple deities, called gods and/or goddesses."
“PAS would like to state that based on Islamic principles, the use of the word "allah" by the people of Abrahamic faiths such as Christianity and Judaism, is acceptable,” said Hadi in a written statement which was read out by party information chief Idris Ahmad.
That was a statement from Hadi quoted in a newspaper report dated 5th January 2010. Read here
Therefore, it is loud and clear that PAS is not following the true Islamic teachings of worshipping one God, Allah when they are promoting the use of Allah in Christianity which believes in trinity; the father, the son and the holy spirit.
While an Islamic state remains the objective of PAS, Kit Siang explained the DAP’s goal is a Malaysia that is a secular nation, with Islam as the official religion. 14th May 2010 in one of the opposition's blog
Secularity is the state of being free from religious or spiritual qualities. -From Yahoo answer
So, this is totally the opposite of what Kit Siang had said by saying that DAP's goal is a Malaysia that is a secular nation (see what secular means), with Islam as the official religion. The two are totally contradictory and it is so weird to put them together.
"In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic." -The German Ideology (1845) Karl Marx's Read the pdf here
The phrase "Malaysian Malaysia" was originally used in the early 1960s as the rallying motto of the Malaysian Solidarity Council, a confederation of political parties formed to oppose Article 153 of the Constitution of Malaysia.
If we studied further what the racist, chauvinist party DAP is all about, their objectives are as follows:
The vision of the party is to establish a peaceful and prosperous social democracy that can unite its disparate races and diverse religions and cultures based on:
1. a Malaysian Malaysia concept by forging Malaysian race with universal moral values,
2. offering equal access and opportunity;
3. democractic governance and rule of law;
4. creating wealth and distributing wealth equitably; and
5. fighting against corruption.
Therefore, there is some link between the communist ideology of Karl Marx and the vision of the DAP racists party. Communist ideology and the true Islamic faith cannot come together because they are the total opposite of one another.
PAS had been lying to their supporters all over the place. Only gullible people who cannot think properly will support PAS. DAP and PAS are like apples and oranges. I rest my case.
